As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
We tested a “remanufactured” magenta 203X together with a CartridgeX brand new build cyan. If you want to jump straight to our top pick, it’s the Refresh Cartridges remanufactured.
Packaging
Neither would win an award for snazzy branding. The CartridgeX in particular looked nothing like its photo and was the plainest of plain white boxes. It could be argued that the manufacturer isn’t wasting your money on graphic design agencies, I suppose. The remanufactured cartridge box looked “home-grown” to say the least: consistent with a relatively small remanufacturing concern you’d think.
Quality
There’s no objective way of judging the quality of what printers produce. See this section of the video to see actual test prints with both the magenta and cyan cartridges in the machine.
We had no qualms about printing stuff off and sending it to customers and potential customers.
Page yield
This is actually the surprising bit with both cartridges exceeding the quoted 2,300 page yield by considerable margins. Not far from double the yield in the case of our top pick. More detail in the video here.
HP 203X yield specification: 2,300 (cyan, magenta, yellow)
Refresh Cartridges yield: 4,222
CartridgeX yield: 3,555
Price
There wasn’t much to choose between these two on price. We paid a pound or so less for the Refresh Cartridges magenta and both were about one quarter of the price of a HP brand cartridge.
Carbon footprint
Being produced “predominantly from re-used components”, the Refresh Cartridges is the clear winner here. Other things being equal, direct re-use is the Gold Standard of low-carbon for a given product.
Verdict
With an emphatically over-performing page yield of 4,222 and environmental credentials to boot, our vote goes to the Refresh Cartridges Remanufactured.
If you’re not a fan of “secondhand” components, then the CartridgeX still yields 3,555 for about the same price.
Apologies to American readers: we could only find these products on amazon.co.uk at the time of publication.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.